Nila Labs · Fee Schedule Intelligence

HVP Contract Rate Analysis

97,780 contracted rates · 13 practices · 127 payers · No ERA data required
$2,049
Largest per-claim gap
UHC cardiac cath: CHC vs PSC
5,144
Below-Medicare rates
Commercial payers paying < MC
$27,921
Rate uplift potential
Per occurrence, top CPTs only
97,780
Contracted rates loaded
From Megan Thomas (4/7/26)

Payer Multipliers (median % of Medicare)

Humana
141%
BCBS Trad
136%
Anthem BCBS
133%
UHC
127%
Cigna
126%
Aetna
112%
Tricare
100%
▲ 100% line = Medicare rate. Commercial payers should be above this.

Critical Finding: Commercial Payers Below Medicare

5,144 CPT×payer combinations where commercial insurers pay less than Medicare — a rate that should be the floor for commercial contracts. UHC alone has 458 below-Medicare CPT codes. Aetna has 535. These represent immediate renegotiation targets for Megan's contracting team.

Cross-Practice Rate Disparities

The same payer pays different HVP practices wildly different rates for identical CPT codes. UHC pays PSC $2,927 for a cardiac cath (93458) but pays CHC only $878 — a $2,049 gap per claim. This gives Megan concrete leverage: "You pay our other practice 3.3× more for the same procedure."

Top Cross-Practice Rate Disparities

PayerCPTProcedureBest RateWorst RateSpreadGap
UHC93458Coronary angiography$2,927$878$2,049CHC→PSC
BCBS93458Coronary angiography$3,040$1,205$1,835ACS TX→CSC
UHC93458Coronary angiography$2,927$1,308$1,619CSC→PSC
Aetna93458Coronary angiography$1,862$849$1,014CHC→PSC
Cigna93458Coronary angiography$1,862$973$889SLHV→PSC
UHC93351Stress echo complete$416$191$225CHC→SLHV
UHC93306TTE w/Doppler$368$169$199CHC→SLHV
Cigna93306TTE w/Doppler$305$190$115SLHV→AFRIDI
Aetna93306TTE w/Doppler$245$158$87CHC→AFRIDI
Aetna99214Office visit E/M$153$89$63SLHV→ACS TX

Commercial Payers Below Medicare

PayerCPTs Below MCAvg % of MCWorst Example
OK Health Network74390%Systematic 90% cap across all codes
Blue Advantage59688%93298 @ AFRIDI: $23 vs MC $102
Aetna53580%93616 @ SLHV: $82 vs MC $460
UHC45877%37247 @ ASRS: $114 vs MC $3,149
BCBS Traditional29186%93298 @ ACS TX: $30 vs MC $93
Meridian27048%37226 @ AHG: $294 vs MC $7,550
Cigna21764%92978-TC @ CSC: $9 vs MC $160

Revenue Context

"The contracted rate is the sum of the insurance portion and the patient portion. If the contracted rate is $1,000, the payer remits $800 and the patient owes $200 in coinsurance. We expect $1,000 total, but if the patient portion never comes in, we're effectively underpaid — just not by the insurer."
— Pat Iannelli, April 7, 2026

This means below-Medicare commercial rates are even worse than they appear — the total expected collection (insurance + patient) is below what Medicare alone would pay.

Revenue Uplift Opportunity: $27,921 per occurrence

If worst-rate practices matched best-rate practices for each payer×CPT combination, the per-occurrence uplift is $27,921 across top CPT codes. At ~100 cardiac caths per practice per year, the cath code alone represents $200K+ in annual rate gap.

Next Steps for Megan Thomas

1. Pull claim volume by CPT per practice to annualize per-occurrence gaps
2. Prioritize renegotiation: start with UHC cardiac caths ($2,049/claim gap)
3. Use cross-practice rates as leverage: "You pay our Colorado practice 3.3× more"
4. Flag all below-Medicare commercial rates for immediate contract review
5. Compare against PayerPrice platform data for regional market benchmarks
6. Provide ERA/835 export from Waystar to run full underpayment verification